*MAJOR SPOILERS AHEAD* Okay, let the title speak for itself; this is a reaction, not a review. Many statements made in this little expression of thought may or may not be cohesive.
Showing posts with label spoilers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label spoilers. Show all posts
Saturday, September 1, 2012
Wednesday, May 2, 2012
Steven Moffat Talks Series 7 of 'Doctor Who' | Spoilers ahead.
Steven Moffat, producer and writer of the BBC drama, Doctor Who, has spoken to Doctor Who TV about the future of the series and what we can expect from the next series, which we already know will consist of the departure of Amy Pond and Rory Williams, the Doctor's current companions.
- Rory and Amy are no longer regular travelers with the Doctor: “If he thinks he needs them, he just pops in on them,” but, “Each time they’ll get a little older.”
- Moffat on killing off companions: “Even if Idon’t think I’ll do it…maybe I will do it!”
- Moffat ponders, “If we did a UNIT story, would Martha be there?”
- The Special Weapons Dalek will definitely appear in the opener
- Moffat reiterates that the New Paradigm Daleks are an “officer class”
- Can the question “Doctor Who?” be answered? “Wait and see”
- We will find out exactly what Trenzalore is all about
- “The Fall of the Eleventh” will also be resolved (perhaps not in Series 7 though)
- Moffat is very keen that the order of the episodes can be swapped around this time
- There will still be a story arc, but it will be “the opposite” of Series 6
- Even though he said no more two-parters, they are still possible if the story requires them
- Jenna-Louise’s companion will be different to the others and is “going to be a shock”
- Filming will continue throughout the rest of 2012 and further into 2013 and beyond
These spoiler-y plot points can be found in tomorrow's issue of the Doctor Who Magazine and its interview with Moffat.
A couple of observations:
- Moffat says that series 7 will consist of a plot arc that is opposite to that of series 6, which [spoilerspoilerspoilerspoilerspoiler] revolves primarily around River Song and her history and involvement with the Doctor. What, exactly, do you think this means? Will the plot arc revolve around the absence of someone? Perhaps a more light-hearted storyline, whereas River's was very tragic? We know that River will be appearing in the series, so could she be involved somehow?
- Karen Gillan has said that Amy and Rory's exit will close things up (many people believe they'll be [spoilerspoilerspoiler] killed by Weeping Angels; but will they survive and make cameos later on?
- What is "different" in Steven Moffat's eyes (RE: the Jenna Louise Coleman comment.) How do you think her companion character will act? I've actually started to believe that she'll be very stubborn and resistant on her quests with the Doctor, and that she may even betray him for her own benefit.
What are your thoughts?
Sunday, March 25, 2012
Film Review | 'The Hunger Games'
The Hunger Games
Directed by Gary Ross
Starring Jennifer Lawrence, Josh
Hutcherson, Elizabeth Banks, Woody Harrelson
Run time: 2h 22m
Distributed by Lionsgate
Rating: 5 stars (A+)
The Hunger Games is the one film
I’ve been waiting three years to see now. I mean, sure there were
the final Potter films, and I did wait for those, but the
anticipation was entirely different for these two franchises. For
Potter, it was definitely more of a sentimental thing for the films
to come out, and as wondrous as the acting is in the films, I
always valued the story much more than I did the people who
represented it. It’s tough for me to admit this, but I think having
that closure nearly a year after the final film definitely helps, as
well as the release of the first film in The Hunger Games.
Looking back, I am able to openly point out flaws in the acting and
in the adaptations made from the books to the films, and while I will
always value Harry Potter more than anything, I think that The
Hunger Games is a wholly better adaptation, and a wholly better
film.
The acting spotlight in this film is
definitely shed on Jennifer Lawrence, whose performance as the
world-renowned heroine in the oppressing Panem trumps over all over
actors in the film. This is probably a result of the fact that
Lawrence’s character is the one seen most in the film. She provides
a sense of irresistible courage balanced with a sense of haughtiness,
something I wasn’t necessarily expecting, but that I definitely
loved. I think the second-best acting job comes from either Woody
Harrelson as Haymitch Abernathy, Katniss and Peeta’s mentor, or
Stanley Tucci as Caesar Flickerman, the Capitol-based talk-show host
whose character plays a much more expanded and important role in the
film than in the first novel. I read many reviews prior to the
official release of the film stating that Harrelson didn’t portray
Haymitch as drunk or funny as he was in the book, but I totally
disagree. Harrelson’s performance definitely deserves an
Academy-Award nomination for its honesty, its complexity, and its
hilarity. Tucci just wowed every single person who saw the film,
cracking a laugh out of the audience just with his charm and his
facial expressions. There always is just something about
Stanley Tucci that wins an audience over. My personal favorite
character in the series’ entirety is Effie Trinket. Effie was
portrayed by Elizabeth Banks, who took Effie’s mannerisms and
eccentricities and built upon them in a major, yet surprisingly
subtly hidden, way. Effie is perhaps the most frighteningly ignorant
character in the series, building a false sense of hope (“Contain
it”) at the Reaping, as well as trying so hard to cheer up the
Tributes when they arrive at the Capitol (“I don’t think they get
dessert. But you do.”). Banks and Harrelson perfectly
portray the animosity between their respective characters as present
in the novel, and Effie is always irritated when Haymitch is around
(“That is mahogany!”). The Tributes, portrayed notably by Leven
Rambin, Jack Quaid, Alexander Ludwig, the chilling Isabelle Fuhrman,
Jacqueline Emerson, Amandla Stenberg, and Dayo Okeniyi, were all
their own characters, something I was worried they wouldn’t be. I
liked the romantic build-up between Glimmer and Cato, seeing as
they’re both attractive people, as well as immensely strong and
powerful. I thought Foxface’s appearance was downsized a bit too
much to the point where a non-reader wouldn’t know the threat she
posed (she wasn’t brutal, but she was stealthy). Amandla Stenberg,
as well as Willow Shields as Prim, delivered a heart-wrenching
performance as Rue, Katniss’s ally during the Games. Her death
scene truly was painful. And of course, I could not have gone through
this film review without mentioning the stylists, most importantly
Cinna. Lenny Kravitz’s performance was astoundingly intimate and
phenomenal, maintaining the ambiguity of his character as well as
providing a sense of adoration and admiration. Truly superb
acting from all, really.
As far as direction and adaptations go,
Gary Ross was a great director for this film. The cinematography, the
screenplay, the set design, everything was just so similar to the way
they were in the novel, and none of that could be so without such an
amazing director. Lionsgate made the right decision bestowing this
tale unto the hands of Gary Ross, and it truly shows. As for
book-to-film translations, I believe this film is the most accurate
that I have seen in my life. More on omissions and inclusions in the
spoiler filled part of this review, appearing below.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)